Hillary Clinton wants to kill Julian Assange via drone strike.

Prior to Tuesday’s 10 AM Wikileaks live stream, @Wikileaks tweeted the following revelation where Hillary asks top brass why she couldn’t kill Julian Assange by drone strike:

The report from True Pundit details efforts to dismantle WikiLeaks and further an ‘internet freedom agenda’.

Hillary is often criticized for her shrewd efforts to ‘destroy’ anyone in the path of her ambition. Julian Assange would be but one of the many silenced victims of Hillary’s cruel ambitions.

Fox News’ Judge Jeanine Pirro’s had an early October opening which detailed Hillary’s horrific mistreatment of young women — all to advance Hillary’s career goals:

It’s unlikely Hillary Clinton would kill Julian Assange before his promised ‘campaign ending’ dump on Hillary Clinton coming tomorrow, but many speculate danger.

There have been earlier suspected assassination attempts on Julian Assange. On Aug 21st at 2:47AM a ‘cat burglar’ attempted to scale Assange’s refuge:

The police station which would have responded to the ‘attempted burglary’ (murder) was a 2 minute walk — yet police only responded 2 hours later:

As tomorrow’s Wikileaks stream looms over Hillary’s campaign, we wish Julian Assange safety.

  • CarlG

    Snopes – “unproven”

    • Concerned OT Resident

      Snopes is for dopes. Use your brain, not some faceless, nameless, on line, agenda touting elitist! Of course she asked for him to be killed and wants him dead. Hillary is the ultimate HAWK!

      • CarlG

        And the deplorables on the burnt orange bus go waaa waaa waa; waaa waaa waaa while Trumpus goes sniffle sniffle sniffle; vile vile vile.

      • James Dylan

        Snopes is for dopes? lol you must be one of those people always posting stupid shit on FB, and other people are always posting links to Snopes in your comments sections, ha ha. Yes, I’m sure you hate Snopes, as they interfere with your confirmation-bias. You gonna’ believe what you wanna’ believe, aintcha?

    • Jake

      You do understand Snopes is nothing but some husband and wife opinions correct????

      • James Dylan

        I’ve had family me tell FactCheck.org is left-leaning,though it’s run by an organization founded by a prominent Republican, Walter Annenberg. Right wing nuts find anything that debunks their rants “biased”. FactCheck reviewed a sample of Snopes’ responses to political rumors regarding George W. Bush, Sarah Palin and Barack Obama, and found them to be free from bias in all cases. FactCheck noted that Barbara Mikkelson was a Canadian citizen (and thus unable to vote in American elections) and David Mikkelson was an independent who was once registered as a Republican. “You’d be hard-pressed to find two more apolitical people,” David Mikkelson told them.

      • James Dylan

        Snopes: “We don’t expect anyone to accept us as the ultimate authority on any
        topic, which is why our site’s name indicates that it contains reference
        pages. Unlike the plethora of anonymous individuals who create and send
        the unsigned, unsourced e-mail messages that are forwarded all over the
        Internet, we show our work. The research materials we’ve used in the
        preparation of any particular page are listed in the bibliography
        displayed at the bottom of that page so that readers who wish to verify
        the validity of our information may check those sources for themselves. (As Snope creators Barbara and David P. Mikkelson reveal on their own site)” – So it isn’t really “Their opinions”.

  • James Dylan

    all for people that say they have a “mission” to research and post news
    stories that the MSM refuse to publish. But when your
    entire website is stories only bashing one political party while
    ignoring another, you just invalidated your reason to exist and you are
    basically the people who you claim to fight. Especially if the “stories” are mostly twists or made-up, it’s a joke.