By 
Evidence continues to grow that election fraud on a massive scale was perpetrated by the Clinton campaign in the Democratic primaries, with thorough coordination and support from the DNC, who are by charter required to remain impartial. The DNC email leaks, which caused uproar and chaos at the party’s convention, confirmed the suspicions of many Bernie Sanders supporters that the party narrative had been biased against the independent Senator from Vermont from the very beginning.
While most of the blame was placed on the head of chairwoman Debbie Wasserman-Schultz, who made only indolent attempts to hide her favoritism, many of the elites responsible for whole affair remain: Donna Brazile, the current interim chair, is implicated in the emails as well and has overtly favored Clinton while sitting on panels at CNN. When three more staffers resigned this month, Brazile and the DNC even thanked them for their service and lamented their loss. The shady network of donors who exert power and influence over the DNC remains on a solid foundation, especially with the lack of resistance (or even outrage) shown by Bernie Sanders, leading his own supporters to boo him for capitulating and endorsing Clinton even after the humiliating story broke.
But it is growing increasingly apparent that it isn’t just democratic principles and ideals that were violated by the Clinton machine; the law, too, was broken. Documents confirm that the Clinton campaign plans to reward donors with appointments to federal boards and commissions, a crime for which former Illinois Governor Rob Blagojevich is serving 14 years in prison. A grassroots group called Watch The Vote has compiled a number of complaints showing ways in which California voters were disenfranchised, and they intend on bringing their findings to a Grand Jury. In Southern California, a number of residents found their political party affiliation changed without their knowledge; because the state’s website doesn’t record IP addresses, it is impossible to know who was behind the attack. Over 126,000 voters in New York were purged without explanation.
On June 7, academics Axel Geijsel of Tilburg University and Rodolfo Barragan of Stanford University published a paper analyzing the outcomes in states with and without paper trails. They found that states where outcomes are more difficult to verify, that is states without direct paper trails, showed far greater support for Hillary Clinton. In addition, they found huge disparities in exit polling data and the results, a hallmark of fraud. They noted that such irregular patterns had not occurred in 2008, confirming that election fraud occurred in the Democratic presidential primary.
Perhaps even more disturbing than the fraud itself are the mysterious deaths of individuals connected with the DNC who could have been working to expose the fraud. The first was Seth Rich, a DNC staffer whose job included analyzing voting data through the Clinton-ran “Voter Expansion Project”. Rich was shot several times in the back while supposedly walking home from his girlfriend’s apartment in Bloomingdale, an affluent neighborhood not particularly known for violent crime. While police have called his murder a “botched robbery”, nothing was taken from his body, and there are no signs of a thievery; Rich appeared to have struggled and fought his attacker, but again, nothing was missing on his person. Wikileaks founder Julian Assange has hinted that Rich may have been a source to leak documents proving fraud.
The second bizarre death was John Ashe, a former UN official who was set to testify against Hillary Clinton in a corruption case. Ashe, along with Chinese businessman Ng Lap Seng (from whom he received $1 billion in donations while serving at the UN), illegally funneled hundreds of thousands of dollars to the DNC during Bill Clinton’s presidency. According to the official report, she died of a heart attack. But according to police on scene, he crushed his own throat in a “workout accident”.
The most recent and perhaps most suspicious yet is the death of Shawn Lucas, the lead attorney who served the DNC with a fraud lawsuit. Lucas appears in this YouTube video, and he was named in a motion filed by the DNC seeking to dismiss the lawsuit on grounds of improper service. No official record yet exists of how Lucas died; according to an unofficial report, he was found dead in a bathroom by his girlfriend. Little more information exists at this point.
Former secret service agent Gary Byrne made this comment regarding Clinton, her temperament and the danger she poses:
BYRNE: I feel so strongly that people need to know the real Hillary Clinton and how dangerous she is in her behavior. She is not a leader. She is not a leader.
HANNITY: She does not have the temperament?
BYRNE: She doesn’t have the temperament. She didn’t have the temperament to handle the social office when she was First Lady, she does not have the temperament.
HANNITY: She’s dishonest.
BYRNE: She’s dishonest, she habitually lies, anybody that can separate themselves from their politics and review her behavior over the past 15 years…
As Donald Trump has raised concern over the conduction of the Democratic primary and the possibility of fraud in the general election, so too are voters growing worried as Clinton’s level of trustworthiness remains dismal. The mainstream media has been in an almost North Korea-style blitz since Trump brought up the issue, with NBC News even suggesting that worrying about fraud is racist. Trump has refused to let up on the issue, driving home its importance in his latest rallies and urging Americans to be vigilant.
Comments